Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Long-term trends in population-based hospitalisation rates for myocardial infarction in England: a national database study of 3.5 million admissions, 1968–2016
  1. F Lucy Wright1,
  2. Nick Townsend2,
  3. Melanie Greenland3,
  4. Michael J Goldacre1,
  5. Kate Smolina4,
  6. Ben Lacey5,
  7. Lee Nedkoff3
  1. 1 Unit of Health-Care Epidemiology, Nuffield Department of Population Health and Big Data Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
  2. 2 Department for Health, University of Bath, Bath, UK
  3. 3 School of Population and Global Health, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
  4. 4 School of Population and Public Health, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
  5. 5 Clinical Trial Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health and Big Data Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr F Lucy Wright, Unit of Health-Care Epidemiology, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK; lucy.wright{at}ndph.ox.ac.uk

Abstract

Aim To analyse the timing and scale of temporal changes in rates of hospitalised myocardial infarction (MI) in England by age and sex from 1968 to 2016.

Methods MI admissions for adults aged 15–84 years were identified from electronic hospital data. We calculated age-standardised and age-specific rates, and examined trends using joinpoint.

Results From 1968 to 2016, there were 3.5 million admissions for MI in England (68% men). Rates increased in the early years of the study in both men and women, peaked in the mid-1980s (355 per 100 000 population in men; 127 in women) and declined by 38.8% in men and 37.4% in women from 1990 to 2011. From 2012, however, modest increases were observed in both sexes. Long-term trends in rates over the study period varied by age and sex, with those aged 70 years and older having the greatest and most sustained increases in the early years (1968–1985). During subsequent years, rates decreased in most age groups until 2010–2011. The exception was younger women (35–49 years) and men (15–34 years) who experienced significant increases from the mid-1990s to 2007 (range +2.1%/year to 4.7%/year). From 2012 onwards, rates increased in all age groups except the oldest, with the most marked increases in men aged 15–34 years (7.2%/year) and women aged 40–49 (6.9%–7.3%/year) .

Conclusion Despite substantial declines in hospital admission rates for MI in England since 1990, the burden of annual admissions remains high. Continued surveillance of trends and coronary disease preventive strategies are warranted.

  • epidemiology
  • ischaemic heart disease
  • record linkage

Data availability statement

Data may be obtained from a third party and are not publicly available. English hospital episode statistics can be obtained from NHS Digital at www.digital.nhs.uk.

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Data availability statement

Data may be obtained from a third party and are not publicly available. English hospital episode statistics can be obtained from NHS Digital at www.digital.nhs.uk.

View Full Text

Supplementary materials

  • Supplementary Data

    This web only file has been produced by the BMJ Publishing Group from an electronic file supplied by the author(s) and has not been edited for content.

Footnotes

  • Contributors FLW and MJG conceptualised the study; all authors contributed to the design of the study, the interpretation of the results and reviewed the manuscript; MG provided statistical advice and conducted the joinpoint analyses; FLW and LN conducted the other data and statistical analyses; FLW wrote the original draft of the manuscript; MJG established the longstanding linked data sets in the Unit of Health-Care Epidemiology, University of Oxford, now part of the Big Data Institute.

  • Funding This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. The research was supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, and by Health Data Research UK (OXFD1). The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health. LN is supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia Early Career Fellowship.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.