HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) web only appendix Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Veerman, J L. Articles by Barendregt, J. J Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Veerman, J L. Articles by Barendregt, J. J Topic Collections Relevant Article

Validity of predictions in health impact assessment

¹ Department of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Centre, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
² School of Population Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
L Veerman
Department of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Centre, PO Box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands; j.veerman{at}erasmusmc.nl

Background: An essential characteristic of health impact assessment (HIA) is that it seeks to predict the future consequences of possible decisions for health. These predictions have to be valid, but as yet it is unclear how validity should be defined in HIA.

Aims: To examine the philosophical basis for predictions and the relevance of different forms of validity to HIA.

Conclusions: HIA is valid if formal validity, plausibility and predictive validity are in order. Both formal validity and plausibility can usually be established, but establishing predictive validity implies outcome evaluation of HIA. This is seldom feasible owing to long time lags, migration, measurement problems, a lack of data and sensitive indicators, and the fact that predictions may influence subsequent events. Predictive validity most often is not attainable in HIA and we have to make do with formal validity and plausibility. However, in political science, this is by no means exceptional.

Abbreviations: EU, European Union; FV, fruits and vegetables; HIA, health impact assessment; IV&V, independent verification and validation

Relevant Article

In this issue

Carlos Alvarez-Dardet and John R Ashton
J Epidemiol Community Health 2007 61: 273. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]