HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Ahnquist, J. Articles by Wamala, S. P Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Ahnquist, J. Articles by Wamala, S. P Topic Collections Relevant Article

Is cumulative exposure to economic hardships more hazardous to women’s health than men’s? A 16-year follow-up study of the Swedish Survey of Living Conditions

¹ Swedish National Institute of Public Health and Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
² Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare, Stockholm, Sweden

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
MrsJ Ahnquist
Swedish National Institute of Public Health, Olof Palmes gata 17, SE-103 52 Stockholm, Sweden;johanna.ahnquist{at}ki.se

Background: Previous research has shown an association between cumulative economic hardships and various health outcomes. However, the cumulative effects of economic hardships in regard to gender differences have not been given enough attention.

Methods: 1981 women and 1799 men were followed up over a period of 16 years (1981–1997), using data from the Swedish Survey of Living Conditions panel study. The temporal association between economic hardships and self-rated health, psychological distress and musculoskeletal disorders was analysed.

Results: A dose–response effect on women’s health was observed with increasing scores of cumulative exposure to financial stress but not with low income. Women exposed to financial stress at both T₁ and T₂ had an increased risk of 1.4–1.6 for all health measures compared with those who were not exposed. A similar consistent dose–response effect was not observed among men.

Conclusions: There is a temporal relationship between cumulative economic hardships and health outcomes, and health effects differ by gender. Financial stress seems to be a stronger predictor of poor health outcomes than low income, particularly among women. Policies geared towards reducing health inequalities should recognise that long-term exposure to economic hardships damages health, and actions need to be taken with a gender perspective.

Abbreviations: CHD, coronary heart disease; SRH, self-rated health; ULF, Swedish Survey of Living Conditions

Relevant Article

In this issue

Carlos Alvarez-Dardet and John R Ashton
J Epidemiol Community Health 2007 61: 273. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]