J Epidemiol Community Health

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 2007;61:211-214; doi:10.1136/jech.2006.049239
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow web only table
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thomson, H.
Right arrow Articles by Petticrew, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thomson, H.
Right arrow Articles by Petticrew, M.
Topic Collections
Right arrowRelevant Article

RESEARCH REPORT

The health impacts of housing-led regeneration: a prospective controlled study

Hilary Thomson1, David Morrison2, Mark Petticrew1

1 MRC Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, Glasgow, UK
2 Public Health, NHS Greater Glasgow, Glasgow, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
MsHilary Thomson
MRC Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, 4 Lilybank Gardens, Glasgow G12 8RZ, UK; hilary{at}msoc.mrc.gla.ac.uk

Study objective: To evaluate self-reported changes in housing quality and health associated with housing-led area regeneration.

Design: A prospective study over 1 year using structured interviews with 50 households who moved to new housing and with 50 matched controls who did not move.

Setting and participants: Residents of two social rented housing schemes in the West of Scotland.

Results: Small but not statistically significant increases in levels of "excellent" or "good" self-reported health status were found in both groups. Both intervention and control groups experienced reductions in problems related to warmth, but no significant change in how they felt about their house.

Conclusions: It is feasible to conduct prospective controlled studies to evaluate the health effects of housing improvement using matched control groups. The absence of marked improvement in health after moving to new housing might be due to the small sample size or to the limited potential to improve health through this intervention alone.



Relevant Article

In this issue
Carlos Alvarez-Dardet and John R Ashton
J Epidemiol Community Health 2007 61: 177. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
H. Thomson, M. Petticrew, and D. Morrison
Better homes, better neighbourhoods
J Epidemiol Community Health, March 1, 2007; 61(3): 214 - 214.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.