HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Moscucci, O. Articles by Clarke, A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Moscucci, O. Articles by Clarke, A. Topic Collections Related Article

Prophylactic oophorectomy: a historical perspective

¹ Centre for History in Public Health, Department of Health and Public Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
² Public Health Resource Unit, Supporting Public Health, 4150 Chancellor Court, Oxford, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr O Moscucci
Centre for History in Public Health, Department of Health and Public Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK; ornella.moscucci{at}lshtm.ac.uk

Removal of a woman’s ovaries (known as bilateral oophorectomy, ovariectomy or, historically, ovariotomy) is undertaken in a number of countries. An estimated 19 000 women aged <60 years had a bilateral prophylactic oophorectomy in the UK in 2003, either as a planned response to an increased specific genetic risk of ovarian or breast cancer or, more frequently, as a prophylactic measure to prevent ovarian cancer. Despite its popularity, however, a full evaluation of the risks, costs and benefits of prophylactic oophorectomy in the absence of genetic markers and at the time of hysterectomy has not yet been undertaken. This paper seeks to provide a historical perspective on current practice by outlining approaches to the ovary in Britain from the 19th century onwards. Historically, ovarian removal has raised many questions about the costs and benefits of surgery. The aim of this article is to highlight the issues, and in so doing, to contribute to a more informed assessment of current practice.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N. Rogers 'Silence has its own Stories': Elizabeth Kenny, Polio and the Culture of Medicine Soc Hist Med, April 1, 2008; 21(1): 145 - 161. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]