HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Topic Collections Relevant Article

Cardiovascular risk prediction tools for populations in Asia

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr Anushka Patel
Asia Pacific Cohort Studies Collaboration Secretariat, The George Institute for International Heath, The University of Sydney, PO Box M201, Missenden Road, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia; apatel{at}thegeorgeinstitute.org

Background: Cardiovascular risk equations are traditionally derived from the Framingham Study. The accuracy of this approach in Asian populations, where resources for risk factor measurement may be limited, is unclear.

Objective: To compare "low-information" equations (derived using only age, systolic blood pressure, total cholesterol and smoking status) derived from the Framingham Study with those derived from the Asian cohorts, on the accuracy of cardiovascular risk prediction.

Design: Separate equations to predict the 8-year risk of a cardiovascular event were derived from Asian and Framingham cohorts. The performance of these equations, and a subsequently "recalibrated" Framingham equation, were evaluated among participants from independent Chinese cohorts.

Setting: Six cohort studies from Japan, Korea and Singapore (Asian cohorts); six cohort studies from China; the Framingham Study from the US.

Participants: 172 077 participants from the Asian cohorts; 25 682 participants from Chinese cohorts and 6053 participants from the Framingham Study.

Main results: In the Chinese cohorts, 542 cardiovascular events occurred during 8 years of follow-up. Both the Asian cohorts and the Framingham equations discriminated cardiovascular risk well in the Chinese cohorts; the area under the receiver–operator characteristic curve was at least 0.75 for men and women. However, the Framingham risk equation systematically overestimated risk in the Chinese cohorts by an average of 276% among men and 102% among women. The corresponding average overestimation using the Asian cohorts equation was 11% and 10%, respectively. Recalibrating the Framingham risk equation using cardiovascular disease incidence from the non-Chinese Asian cohorts led to an overestimation of risk by an average of 4% in women and underestimation of risk by an average of 2% in men.

Interpretation: A low-information Framingham cardiovascular risk prediction tool, which, when recalibrated with contemporary data, is likely to estimate future cardiovascular risk with similar accuracy in Asian populations as tools developed from data on local cohorts.

Abbreviations: APCSC, Asia Pacific Cohort Studies Collaboration; EGAT, Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand; ICD, International Classification of Disease; SBP, systolic blood pressure

Relevant Article

In this issue

Carlos Alvarez-Dardet and John R Ashton
J Epidemiol Community Health 2007 61: 89. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				V. Perkovic, R. Huxley, Y. Wu, D. Prabhakaran, and S. MacMahon The Burden of Blood Pressure-Related Disease: A Neglected Priority for Global Health Hypertension, December 1, 2007; 50(6): 991 - 997. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Hippisley-Cox, C. Coupland, Y. Vinogradova, J. Robson, M. May, and P. Brindle Derivation and validation of QRISK, a new cardiovascular disease risk score for the United Kingdom: prospective open cohort study BMJ, July 21, 2007; 335(7611): 136 - 136. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]