|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
EVIDENCE-BASED PUBLIC HEALTH POLICY AND PRACTICE |
1 Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
2 Department of Public Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Correspondence to:
Barbara Starfield, Johns Hopkins University, 624 North Broadway, Room 452, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; bstarfie{at}jhsph.edu
Income inequality is widely assumed to be a major contributor to poorer health at national and subnational levels. According to this assumption, the most appropriate policy strategy to improve equity in health is income redistribution. This paper considers reasons why tackling income inequality alone could be an inadequate approach to reducing differences in health across social classes and other population subgroups, and makes the case that universal social programs are critical to reducing inequities in health. A health system oriented around a strong primary care base is an example of such a strategy.
Abbreviations: OECD, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Relevant Article
J Epidemiol Community Health 2007 61: 1017.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Blakely, M. Tobias, and J. Atkinson Inequalities in mortality during and after restructuring of the New Zealand economy: repeated cohort studies BMJ, February 16, 2008; 336(7640): 371 - 375. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS | REGISTER |