HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bambra, C. Articles by Whitehead, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bambra, C. Articles by Whitehead, M. Topic Collections Relevant Article

The psychosocial and health effects of workplace reorganisation. 2. A systematic review of task restructuring interventions

¹ Centre for Public Policy and Health, Wolfson Research Institute, Durham University
² Medical Research Council Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow
³ Division of Public Health, University of Liverpool

Correspondence to:
Clare Bambra, Centre for Public Policy and Health, Wolfson Research Institute, Durham University Queen’s Campus, Stockton on Tees TS17 6BH, UK; clare.bambra{at}durham.ac.uk

Objective: To systematically review the health and psychosocial effects (with reference to the demand–control–support model) of changes to the work environment brought about by task structure work reorganisation, and to determine whether those effects differ for different socioeconomic groups.

Design: Systematic review (QUORUM) of experimental and quasi-experimental studies (any language) reporting health and psychosocial effects of such interventions.

Data sources: Seventeen electronic databases (medical, social science and economic), bibliographies and expert contacts.

Results: Nineteen studies were reviewed. Some task-restructuring interventions failed to alter the psychosocial work environment significantly, and so could not be expected to have a measurable effect on health. Those that increased demand and decreased control tended to have an adverse effect on health, while those that decreased demand and increased control resulted in improved health, although some effects were minimal. Increases in workplace support did not appear to mediate this relationship.

Conclusion: This systematic review suggests that task-restructuring interventions that increase demand or decrease control adversely affect the health of employees, in line with observational research. It lends support to policy initiatives such as the recently enforced EU directive on participation at work, which aims to increase job control and autonomy.

Keywords: systematic review; health inequalities; psychosocial work environment

Relevant Article

In this issue

Carlos Alvarez-Dardet and John Ashton
J Epidemiol Community Health 2007 61: 1017. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]