J Epidemiol Community Health

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 2007;61:984-989; doi:10.1136/jech.2006.058404
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Free to AccessThis article has been Unlocked
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Canvin, K.
Right arrow Articles by Whitehead, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Canvin, K.
Right arrow Articles by Whitehead, M.
Topic Collections
Right arrow Unlocked
Right arrowRelevant Article

EVIDENCE-BASED PUBLIC HEALTH POLICY AND PRACTICE

Can I risk using public services? Perceived consequences of seeking help and health care among households living in poverty: qualitative study

Krysia Canvin1, Chris Jones2, Anneli Marttila3, Bo Burström3, Margaret Whitehead1

1 Division of Public Health, University of Liverpool, Whelan Building, Quadrangle, Brownlow Hill, Liverpool L69 3GB, UK
2 Department of Sociology and Social Policy, University of Liverpool, Eleanor Rathbone Building, Bedford Street South, Liverpool L69 7ZA, UK
3 Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Norrbacka, SE-171 76 Stockholm, Sweden

Correspondence to:
M Whitehead, Division of Public Health, University of Liverpool, Whelan Building, Quadrangle, Brownlow Hill, Liverpool L69 3GB, UK; mmw{at}liverpool.ac.uk

Objectives: To improve understanding of how families living in adverse conditions perceive their encounters with public services and how past experiences influence current and future attempts to seek help.

Design: Qualitative interviews with adult members of households living in poverty in deprived areas, plus observations conducted in the surrounding neighbourhoods and service settings.

Participants: Purposive sample of 25 adults living in a deprived area, on welfare benefits.

Setting: Eight sites in disadvantaged areas in Merseyside, North Wales, London and Greater Manchester in 2004/05.

Results: Participants generally perceived public services as a source of distrust and a potential risk to well-being. Encounters with a range of services were perceived as risky in terms of losing resources, being misunderstood or harshly judged, and carrying the ultimate threat of losing custody of their children. Participants perceived that they were subjected to increasing levels of surveillance, with fear of "being told on" by neighbours, in addition to service providers, adding to anxiety. Adverse consequences included avoiding child health and social services, anxiety and self-imposed isolation.

Conclusions: Approaching services was perceived as akin to taking a gamble that might or might not result in their needs being met. Faced with this "choice", participants employed strategies to minimise the risks that on the surface may appear risky to health. If public services are to succeed in providing support to disadvantaged families, greater efforts are needed to build trust and demonstrate understanding for the strategies these families use to maintain their well-being against formidable odds.


Keywords: perception of public services; poverty; public health; qualitative research; strategies for health


Relevant Article

IN THIS ISSUE
Carlos Alvarez-Dardet and John Ashton
J Epidemiol Community Health 2007 61: 929. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.