HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Popay, J. Articles by Barker, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Popay, J. Articles by Barker, J. Topic Collections Relevant Article

Social problems, primary care and pathways to help and support: addressing health inequalities at the individual level. Part I: the GP perspective

¹ Institute for Health Research, University of Lancaster, UK
² Department of Geography, Manchester University, UK

Correspondence to:
Professor Jennie Popay, Institute for Health Research, Lancaster University, Alexandra Square, Lancaster LA1 4NT, UK; j.popay{at}lancaster.ac.uk

Objectives: This study aimed to describe social problems presented to general practitioners (GPs) in UK inner cities and GPs’ responses; describe patients’ help-seeking pathways; and consider how these pathways can be improved.

Methods: The study involved a pilot survey and follow-up qualitative interviews with patients in two inner city areas in London and Salford in 2001–2. The pilot survey involved five practices in each locality. GPs completed questionnaires on 57 people presenting with social problems. A diversity sample of 12 patients were followed up for interview.

Results: Study results are presented in two parts. This paper focuses on the GP survey results. People were presenting with a wide range of social problems, and multiple problems were also common. Problems with welfare benefits and housing were the most common, but GPs were most likely to refer to counselling services and to a lesser extent to generic advice services. Some GPs would have preferred to refer patients to more problem-specific services but did not believe these were available.

Conclusions: The study highlights the role GPs play in helping people deal with social problems but also identifies limitations in their response to these problems. It points to the need for more integrated pathways to help and advice for social problems. Primary care can make existing pathways more visible and accessible, and create new pathways through, for example, the new commissioning role and extending the scope of social prescribing.

Abbreviations: GP, general practitioner; PPI, patient and public involvement

Relevant Article

IN THIS ISSUE

Carlos Alvarez-Dardet and John Ashton
J Epidemiol Community Health 2007 61: 929. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Popay, U. Kowarzik, S. Mallinson, S. Mackian, and J. Barker Social problems, primary care and pathways to help and support: addressing health inequalities at the individual level. Part II: lay perspectives J Epidemiol Community Health, November 1, 2007; 61(11): 972 - 977. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]