HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Egan, M. Articles by Drever, F. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Egan, M. Articles by Drever, F. Topic Collections Relevant Article

"Profits before people"? A systematic review of the health and safety impacts of privatising public utilities and industries in developed countries

¹ Medical Research Council Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
² Department of Public Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK

Correspondence to:
Dr M Egan, MRC SPHSU, 4 Lilybank Gardens, Glasgow G128RZ, UK; m.egan{at}sphsu.mrc.ac.uk

Debates on government privatisation policies have often focused on the alleged effects of privatisation on health and safety. A systematic review (through Quality of Reporting of Meta-analysis) of the effects of privatising industries and utilities on the health (including injuries) of employees and the public was conducted. The data sources were electronic databases (medical, social science and economic), bibliographies and expert contacts. Experimental and quasi-experimental studies were sought, dating from 1945, from any Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development member country (in any language) that evaluated the health outcomes of such interventions. Eleven highly heterogeneous studies that evaluated the health impacts of privatisation of building, water, paper, cement, bus, rail, mining, electric and gas companies were identified. The most robust study found increases in the measures of stress-related ill health among employees after a privatisation intervention involving company downsizing. No robust evidence was found to link privatisation with increased injury rates for employees or customers. In conclusion, public debates on the health and safety implications of privatisation have a poor empirical base, which policy makers and researchers need to address. Some evidence suggests that adverse health outcomes could result from redundancies associated with privatisation.

Abbreviations: ITS, interrupted time series; OSI, occupational stress indicator

Relevant Article

In this issue

Carlos Alvarez-Dardet and John R Ashton
J Epidemiol Community Health 2007 61: 841. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Corrigall, S. Plagerson, C. Lund, and J. Myers Global Trade and Mental Health Global Social Policy, December 1, 2008; 8(3): 335 - 358. [Abstract] [PDF]