HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Allen, E Articles by Oakley, A Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Allen, E Articles by Oakley, A Topic Collections Related Article

Does the UK government’s teenage pregnancy strategy deal with the correct risk factors? Findings from a secondary analysis of data from a randomised trial of sex education and their implications for policy

¹ Department of Primary Care and Population Sciences, Centre for Sexual Health and HIV Research, University College London, London, UK
² Public and Environmental Health Research Unit, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
³ Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London, London, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
E Allen
Department of Primary Care and Population Sciences, Centre for Sexual Health and HIV Research, University College London, Mortimer Market Centre, off Capper Street, London WC1E 6AU, UK;e.allen{at}uk.imshealth.com

Background: Much of the UK government’s 1999 report on teenage pregnancy was by necessity based on rather old or non-longitudinal research.

Aim: To examine the associations between risk factors identified in the report and pregnancy at or before age 16 years among young women and partners of young men using the more recent data.

Results: Socioeconomic disadvantage, being born to a teenage mother, expectation of being a teenage parent, low educational expectations and various other behaviours are potential risk factors for teenage pregnancy, as suggested by unadjusted analyses. Those who cited school as providing information on sex had a reduced risk of pregnancy at or before age 16 years, as did girls reporting easy communication with parent or guardian at baseline. Various measures of low sexual health knowledge were not associated, in either adjusted or unadjusted analyses, with increased risk of pregnancy at or before age 16 years among boys or girls.

Conclusions: A focus on many of the risk factors identified in the 1999 report is supported herein. It is suggested that knowledge may not be an important determinant, but that relationships with parents and school, as well as expectations for the future, may have important influences on teenage pregnancy. The analysis also provides new insights into risk factors for pregnancies among the partners of young men.

Abbreviations: RIPPLE, Randomised Intervention of Pupil Peer-Led sex Education

Related Article

In this issue

Carlos Alvarez-Dardet and John R Ashton
J. Epidemiol. Community Health 2007 61: 1. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]