HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Berger, M. Articles by Weintraub, J. M Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Berger, M. Articles by Weintraub, J. M

Review of syndromic surveillance: implications for waterborne disease detection

¹ San Francisco Department of Public Health, Environmental Health Section, USA
² San Francisco Department of Public Health, Communicable Disease Control and Prevention Section

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
MsM Berger
San Francisco Department of Public Health, Environmental Health Section, 1390 Market Street, Suite 910, San Francisco, CA 94102, USA; mberger{at}health.nyc.gov

ABSTRACT
Syndromic surveillance is the gathering of data for public health purposes before laboratory or clinically confirmed information is available. Interest in syndromic surveillance has increased because of concerns about bioterrorism. In addition to bioterrorism detection, syndromic surveillance may be suited to detecting waterborne disease outbreaks. Theoretical benefits of syndromic surveillance include potential timeliness, increased response capacity, ability to establish baseline disease burdens, and ability to delineate the geographical reach of an outbreak. This review summarises the evidence gathered from retrospective, prospective, and simulation studies to assess the efficacy of syndromic surveillance for waterborne disease detection. There is little evidence that syndromic surveillance mitigates the effects of disease outbreaks through earlier detection and response. Syndromic surveillance should not be implemented at the expense of traditional disease surveillance, and should not be relied upon as a principal outbreak detection tool. The utility of syndromic surveillance is dependent on alarm thresholds that can be evaluated in practice. Syndromic data sources such as over the counter drug sales for detection of waterborne outbreaks should be further evaluated.

Keywords: syndromic surveillance; waterborne disease; surveillance

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. Frumkin, J. Hess, G. Luber, J. Malilay, and M. McGeehin Climate Change: The Public Health Response Am J Public Health, March 1, 2008; 98(3): 435 - 445. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]