HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Read responses to this article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lynch, J. Articles by Bainbridge, K. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Lynch, J. Articles by Bainbridge, K.

Explaining the social gradient in coronary heart disease: comparing relative and absolute risk approaches

¹ Department Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
² Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol, UK
³ Social and Scientific Systems, Silver Spring, USA

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Professor J Lynch
Department Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Purvis Hall, 1020 Pine Avenue West, Montreal, Canada QC H3A 1A2; John.Lynch{at}McGill.ca

Study objectives: There are contradictory perspectives on the importance of conventional coronary heart disease (CHD) risk factors in explaining population levels and social gradients in CHD. This study examined the contribution of conventional CHD risk factors (smoking, hypertension, dyslipidaemia, and diabetes) to explaining population levels and to absolute and relative social inequalities in CHD. This was investigated in an entire population and by creating a low risk sub-population with no smoking, dyslipidaemia, diabetes, and hypertension to simulate what would happen to relative and social inequalities in CHD if conventional risk factors were removed.

Design, setting, and participants: Population based study of 2682 eastern Finnish men aged 42, 48, 54, 60 at baseline with 10.5 years average follow up of fatal (ICD9 codes 410–414) and non-fatal (MONICA criteria) CHD events.

Main results: In the whole population, 94.6% of events occurred among men exposed to at least one conventional risk factor, with a PAR of 68%. Adjustment for conventional risk factors reduced relative social inequality by 24%. However, in a low risk population free from conventional risk factors, absolute social inequality reduced by 72%.

Conclusions: Conventional risk factors explain the majority of absolute social inequality in CHD because conventional risk factors explain the vast majority of CHD cases in the population. However, the role of conventional risk factors in explaining relative social inequality was modest. This apparent paradox may arise in populations where inequalities in conventional risk factors between social groups are low, relative to the high levels of conventional risk factors within every social group. If the concern is to reduce the overall population health burden of CHD and the disproportionate population health burden associated with the social inequalities in CHD, then reducing conventional risk factors will do the job.

Keywords: inequalities; coronary heart disease; population

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. B. Dowd and A. E Aiello Did national folic acid fortification reduce socioeconomic and racial disparities in folate status in the US? Int. J. Epidemiol., October 1, 2008; 37(5): 1059 - 1066. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. Andersen, N. KR. Rasmussen, P.O. Ostergren, F. Carlsson, M. Grahn, and F. Diderichsen Does job strain mediate the effect of socioeconomic group on smoking behaviour? The impact of different health policies in Denmark and Sweden Scand J Public Health, August 1, 2008; 36(6): 598 - 606. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Harper, J. Lynch, S. C. Meersman, N. Breen, W. W. Davis, and M. E. Reichman Harper et al. Respond to "Measuring Social Disparities in Health" Am. J. Epidemiol., April 15, 2008; 167(8): 905 - 907. [Full Text] [PDF]

				S E Ramsay, R W Morris, L T Lennon, S G Wannamethee, and P H Whincup Are social inequalities in mortality in Britain narrowing? Time trends from 1978 to 2005 in a population-based study of older men J Epidemiol Community Health, January 1, 2008; 62(1): 75 - 80. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y H Khang, J W Lynch, K Jung-Choi, and H J Cho Explaining age-specific inequalities in mortality from all causes, cardiovascular disease and ischaemic heart disease among South Korean male public servants: relative and absolute perspectives Heart, January 1, 2008; 94(1): 75 - 82. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Harper and J. Lynch Highly active antiretroviral therapy and socioeconomic inequalities in AIDS mortality in Spain Eur J Public Health, April 1, 2007; 17(2): 231 - 231. [Full Text] [PDF]

eLetters: