J Epidemiol Community Health

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 2006;60:202-207; doi:10.1136/jech.2005.041020
Copyright © 2006 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schootman, M.
Right arrow Articles by Walker, M. S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schootman, M.
Right arrow Articles by Walker, M. S
Topic Collections
Right arrowRelevant Article

EVIDENCE BASED PUBLIC HEALTH POLICY AND PRACTICE

Effect of area poverty rate on cancer screening across US communities

Mario Schootman1,2, Donna B Jeffe1,2, Elizabeth A Baker3, Mark S Walker1,2

1 Division of Health Behavior Research, Departments of Pediatrics and Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA
2 The Alvin J Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine and Barnes-Jewish Hospital, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA
3 Department of Community Health, Saint Louis School of Public Health, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr M Schootman
Washington University, Division of Health Behavior Research, 4444 Forest Park Blvd, Box 8504, Saint Louis, MO 63108, USA; mschootm{at}im.wustl.edu

Study objective: To analyse the contextual effect of area poverty rate on never having been screened for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer by (1) describing the extent of the variation in screening behaviours among 98 US metropolitan areas; (2) determining if the variation in lack of screening can be explained by differences in the characteristics of the persons who resided in these areas; and (3) determining if living in a metropolitan area with a higher poverty rate increased the likelihood of never having been screened for cancer over and above individual characteristics.

Design: Cross sectional survey using data from the 2002 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Multilevel logistic regression included both individual level factors as well as area poverty rate.

Setting: Ninety eight areas across the USA.

Participants: Over 118 000 persons residing in 98 areas; a sample aimed at estimating 48.3% of the US population age 18 or older.

Main results: After adjustment for individual level factors, increasing area level poverty rate (per 5%) remained associated with never having had a mammogram (odds ratio (OR) = 1.28, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.03 to 1.37); clinical breast examination (OR = 1.28, 95% CI: 1.11 to 1.48), colonoscopy/sigmoidoscopy (OR = 1.10, 95% CI: 1.01 to 1.19), and a faecal occult blood test (OR = 1.19, 95% CI: 1.12 to 1.27). Poverty rate was not independently associated with never having had a Pap smear (OR = 1.12; 95% CI: 0.90 to 1.41). The size of the variance among metropolitan or micropolitan statistical areas (MMSAs) varied by type of screening test, with intraclass correlation coefficients ranging from 4.9% (never having had a Pap smear) to 1.2% (never having had a colonoscopy/sigmoidoscopy).

Conclusions: Area poverty rate was independently associated with never having been screened for breast and colorectal cancer, but not cervical cancer. The size of the variance among MMSAs was modest at best.


Keywords: cancer; screening; geography; poverty; socioeconomic status


Relevant Article

In this issue
Carlos Alvarez-Dardet and John R Ashton
J Epidemiol Community Health 2006 60: 185. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
E. P. Whitlock, J. S. Lin, E. Liles, T. L. Beil, and R. Fu
Screening for Colorectal Cancer: A Targeted, Updated Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
Ann Intern Med, November 4, 2008; 149(9): 638 - 658.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
C. A. Reyes-Ortiz, K. Eschbach, D. D. Zhang, and J. S. Goodwin
Neighborhood Composition and Cancer among Hispanics: Tumor Stage and Size at Time of Diagnosis
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., November 1, 2008; 17(11): 2931 - 2936.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Fam MedHome page
S. M. Bernheim, J. S. Ross, H. M. Krumholz, and E. H. Bradley
Influence of Patients' Socioeconomic Status on Clinical Management Decisions: A Qualitative Study
Ann. Fam. Med, January 1, 2008; 6(1): 53 - 59.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
A. B. Dailey, S. V. Kasl, T. R. Holford, L. Calvocoressi, and B. A. Jones
Neighborhood-Level Socioeconomic Predictors of Nonadherence to Mammography Screening Guidelines
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., November 1, 2007; 16(11): 2293 - 2303.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CA Cancer J ClinHome page
D. Saslow, P. E. Castle, J. T. Cox, D. D. Davey, M. H. Einstein, D. G. Ferris, S. J. Goldie, D. M. Harper, W. Kinney, A.-B. Moscicki, et al.
American Cancer Society Guideline for Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Vaccine Use to Prevent Cervical Cancer and Its Precursors
CA Cancer J Clin, January 1, 2007; 57(1): 7 - 28.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2006 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.