J Epidemiol Community Health

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 2006;60:1040-1047; doi:10.1136/jech.2005.045302
Copyright © 2006 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Middleton, N.
Right arrow Articles by Gunnell, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Middleton, N.
Right arrow Articles by Gunnell, D.
Topic Collections
Right arrowRelevant Article

EVIDENCE BASED PUBLIC HEALTH POLICY AND PRACTICE

The geography of despair among 15–44-year-old men in England and Wales: putting suicide on the map

Nicos Middleton, Jonathan A C Sterne, David Gunnell

Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Bristol, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
N Middleton
Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Whiteladies Road, Bristol BS8 2PR, UK; nmitlett{at}hsph.harvard.edu

Objective: To investigate the spatial patterning and possible contributors to the geographical distribution of suicide among 15–44- year-old men.

Design: Small-area analysis and mapping of geo-coded 1988–94 suicide mortality data and 1991 census data using random-effects smoothing.

Setting: 9265 electoral wards in England and Wales (mean population of men aged 15–44- years: about 1220).

Main results: Two main patterns emerged: (a) in all of the 10 most densely populated cities studied, suicide showed a "bull’s-eye" pattern with rates highest in the inner-city areas and, in some cases, low rates in the peripheries, and (b) suicide rates were high in coastal areas, particularly those in more remote regions. Possible indicators of social fragmentation, such as the proportion of single-person households in an area, were most strongly and consistently associated with rates of suicide in both urban and rural areas. Levels of unemployment and long-term illness accounted for some of the coastal patterning. Although characteristics of areas accounted for more than half of the observed variability, substantial between-area variability in rates remained unexplained.

Conclusions: The area characteristics investigated here did not fully account for the higher suicide rates observed in the most rural or remote areas. Alongside social and economic aspects, rural life itself may have an independent effect on the risk of suicide. A greater understanding of local geographies of suicide, and particularly the possible interactions between characteristics of people and their environments, might assist the design of prevention strategies that target those areas (and their characteristics) where risk is concentrated.


Abbreviations: SMR, standardised mortality ratio


Relevant Article

In this issue
Carlos Alvarez-Dardet and John R Ashton
J Epidemiol Community Health 2006 60: 1005. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2006 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.