|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
REVIEW |
1 Department of Society, Human Development and Health, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, USA
2 Institute National de la Santé et de la Recherche Medicale, CERMES, Villejuif, France
3 History and Sociology of Science Department, and Family Practice and Community Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
4 Community Health Programs, Brigham and Womens Hospital, and Director, Harvard Medical Schools Center of Excellence in Womens Health, Boston, USA
5 The Center for Clinical Trials and Evidence-Based Healthcare, Brown University, Providence, USA
6 Gynecologic Oncology, Brigham and Womens Hospital, and Dana Farber Cancer Center, Boston, USA
7 National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, USA
8 Department of Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, USA
9 Division of Womens Health, Brigham and Womens Hospital, and Connors Center for Womens Health and Gender Biology, Boston, USA
10 Harvard School of Public Health and Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
11 Our Bodies Ourselves, Boston, USA
12 National Womens Health Network, Washington, USA
13 Department of the History of Science, Harvard University
14 Slone Epidemiology Center, Boston University, Boston, USA
15 Author
16 Department of Anatomy and Cellular Biology, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, USA
17 Center for Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Oregon, Eugene, USA
18 Social Studies of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Professor N Krieger
Department of Society, Human Development and Health, Harvard School of Public Health, Kresge 717, 677 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02130, USA; nkrieger{at}hsph.harvard.edu
Routine acceptance of use of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) was shattered in 2002 when results of the largest HRT randomised clinical trial, the womens health initiative, indicated that long term use of oestrogen plus progestin HRT not only was associated with increased risk of cancer but, contrary to expectations, did not decrease, and may have increased, risk of cardiovascular disease. In June 2004 a group of historians, epidemiologists, biologists, clinicians, and womens health advocates met to discuss the scientific and social context of and response to these findings. It was found that understanding the evolving and contending knowledge on hormones and health requires: (1) considering its societal context, including the impact of the pharmaceutical industry, the biomedical emphasis on individualised risk and preventive medicine, and the gendering of hormones; and (2) asking why, for four decades, since the mid-1960s, were millions of women prescribed powerful pharmacological agents already demonstrated, three decades earlier, to be carcinogenic? Answering this question requires engaging with core issues of accountability, complexity, fear of mortality, and the conduct of socially responsible science.
Abbreviations: HRT, hormone replacement therapy; WHI, womens health initiative; HERS, heart and estrogen/progestin replacement study
Keywords: hormone replacement therapy; oestrogen; cancer; womens health; history
Related Article
J. Epidemiol. Community Health 2005 59: 713.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. Krieger Hormone therapy and the rise and perhaps fall of US breast cancer incidence rates: critical reflections Int. J. Epidemiol., June 1, 2008; 37(3): 627 - 637. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Paul Commentary: Hormone therapy and breast cancer incidence: did epidemiologists miss an effect on national trends? Int. J. Epidemiol., June 1, 2008; 37(3): 638 - 640. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Mishra, H. Kok, R. Ecob, R. Cooper, R. Hardy, and D. Kuh Cessation of Hormone Replacement Therapy After Reports of Adverse Findings From Randomized Controlled Trials: Evidence From a British Birth Cohort Am J Public Health, July 1, 2006; 96(7): 1219 - 1225. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS | REGISTER |