J Epidemiol Community Health

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 2005;59:740-748; doi:10.1136/jech.2005.033316
Copyright © 2005 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Krieger, N.
Right arrow Articles by Weisz, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Krieger, N.
Right arrow Articles by Weisz, G.
Topic Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

REVIEW

Hormone replacement therapy, cancer, controversies, and women’s health: historical, epidemiological, biological, clinical, and advocacy perspectives

Nancy Krieger1, Ilana Löwy2, Robert Aronowitz3, Judyann Bigby4, Kay Dickersin5, Elizabeth Garner6, Jean-Paul Gaudillière2, Carolina Hinestrosa7, Ruth Hubbard8, Paula A Johnson9, Stacey A Missmer10, Judy Norsigian11, Cynthia Pearson12, Charles E Rosenberg13, Lynn Rosenberg14, Barbara G Rosenkrantz13, Barbara Seaman15, Carlos Sonnenschein16, Ana M Soto16, Joe Thornton17, George Weisz18

1 Department of Society, Human Development and Health, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, USA
2 Institute National de la Santé et de la Recherche Medicale, CERMES, Villejuif, France
3 History and Sociology of Science Department, and Family Practice and Community Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
4 Community Health Programs, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, and Director, Harvard Medical School’s Center of Excellence in Women’s Health, Boston, USA
5 The Center for Clinical Trials and Evidence-Based Healthcare, Brown University, Providence, USA
6 Gynecologic Oncology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, and Dana Farber Cancer Center, Boston, USA
7 National Breast Cancer Coalition, Washington, USA
8 Department of Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, USA
9 Division of Women’s Health, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, and Connors Center for Women’s Health and Gender Biology, Boston, USA
10 Harvard School of Public Health and Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
11 Our Bodies Ourselves, Boston, USA
12 National Women’s Health Network, Washington, USA
13 Department of the History of Science, Harvard University
14 Slone Epidemiology Center, Boston University, Boston, USA
15 Author
16 Department of Anatomy and Cellular Biology, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, USA
17 Center for Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Oregon, Eugene, USA
18 Social Studies of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Canada

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Professor N Krieger
Department of Society, Human Development and Health, Harvard School of Public Health, Kresge 717, 677 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02130, USA; nkrieger{at}hsph.harvard.edu

Routine acceptance of use of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) was shattered in 2002 when results of the largest HRT randomised clinical trial, the women’s health initiative, indicated that long term use of oestrogen plus progestin HRT not only was associated with increased risk of cancer but, contrary to expectations, did not decrease, and may have increased, risk of cardiovascular disease. In June 2004 a group of historians, epidemiologists, biologists, clinicians, and women’s health advocates met to discuss the scientific and social context of and response to these findings. It was found that understanding the evolving and contending knowledge on hormones and health requires: (1) considering its societal context, including the impact of the pharmaceutical industry, the biomedical emphasis on individualised risk and preventive medicine, and the gendering of hormones; and (2) asking why, for four decades, since the mid-1960s, were millions of women prescribed powerful pharmacological agents already demonstrated, three decades earlier, to be carcinogenic? Answering this question requires engaging with core issues of accountability, complexity, fear of mortality, and the conduct of socially responsible science.


Abbreviations: HRT, hormone replacement therapy; WHI, women’s health initiative; HERS, heart and estrogen/progestin replacement study

Keywords: hormone replacement therapy; oestrogen; cancer; women’s health; history


Related Article

An interdisciplinary analysis of the hormone replacement therapy saga
John R Ashton and Carlos Alvarez-Dardet
J. Epidemiol. Community Health 2005 59: 713. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
N. Krieger
Hormone therapy and the rise and perhaps fall of US breast cancer incidence rates: critical reflections
Int. J. Epidemiol., June 1, 2008; 37(3): 627 - 637.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
C. Paul
Commentary: Hormone therapy and breast cancer incidence: did epidemiologists miss an effect on national trends?
Int. J. Epidemiol., June 1, 2008; 37(3): 638 - 640.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Public HealthHome page
G. Mishra, H. Kok, R. Ecob, R. Cooper, R. Hardy, and D. Kuh
Cessation of Hormone Replacement Therapy After Reports of Adverse Findings From Randomized Controlled Trials: Evidence From a British Birth Cohort
Am J Public Health, July 1, 2006; 96(7): 1219 - 1225.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2005 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.